IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
GREE, INC., §
§
Plaintiff, §
§
v. §
Case No. 2:19-cv-00070-JRG-RSP §
SUPERCELL OY, §
§
Defendant. §
§
ORDER
Defendant Supercell filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Provisional Damages. (Dkt. No. 195.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 326), recommending denial of Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Defendant has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 352) to the Report and Recommendation, with Plaintiff GREE, Inc. filing a Response. (Dkt. No. 369.)
After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion for Partial Summary . Judgment, the Report and Recommendation, and the briefing on Defendant’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous.
Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Defendant’s Objections and ADOPTS Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation and DENIES the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 195).
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 24th day of August, 2020.