Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Sgromo et al v. Bestway Enterprise Co. Ltd. et al, No. 2:19-cv-00060 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 25, 2019)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00060, Dkt. No. 98
Decided
September 25, 2019
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 71 Report and Recommendations
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

§

PIETRO PASQUALE ANTONI

§

SGROMO,

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v.

§

BESTWAY ENTERPRISE CO. LTD.,

§

BESTWAY (HONG KONG)

§

INTERNATIONAL LTD., BESTWAY

§

INFLATABLES AND MATERIAL Case No. 2:19-cv-00060-JRG-RSP

§

CORPORATION, EUREKA

§

INVENTIONS LLC, HEB GROCERY

§

COMPANY LP, ACADEMY LTD,

§

BESTWAY GLOBAL HOLDING

§

COMPANY INC., TARGET STORES

§

INC., WAL-MART STORES, INC., and

§

WAL-MART STORES TEXAS, LLC,

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Payne dated August 29, 2019. (Dkt. No. 71.) Within this Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Payne concluded that Plaintiff Pietro Pasquale Antoni Sgromo (“Plaintiff”) failed to show that he has proper standing for the asserted patents and the asserted trademark. (Id.) Consequently, Magistrate Judge Payne recommended that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 20) be GRANTED due to Plaintiff’s lack of standing. (Dkt. No. 71.) Plaintiff filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. No. 93.)

After reviewing the underlying briefing, the Report and Recommendation, and Plaintiff’s objection, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ADOPTED, and the objections are both OVERRULED.

2So Ordered this Sep 24, 2019

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Sgromo et al v. Bestway Enterprise Co. Ltd. et al, No. 2:19-cv-00060 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 25, 2019).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_19-cv-00060-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_19-cv-00060-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.