Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Kipb LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:19-cv-00056 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2020)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00056, Dkt. No. 78
Decided
March 27, 2020
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 75 Report and Recommendations
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

KIPB LLC, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. §

§

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; §

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-cv-56-JRG-RSP AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG §

SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; SAMSUNG §

AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC; §

AND QUALCOMM GLOBAL §

TRADING PTE. LTD., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

Defendant Qualcomm Global Trading Pte. Ltd. (“QGT”) previously filed a Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. No. 39.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation, recommending that QGT’s Motion be denied in all respects. (Dkt. No. 75.) QGT has now filed an Objection (Dkt. No. 77) to the Report and Recommendation. .

After reviewing the briefing for the Motion to Dismiss, the Report and Recommendation, and QGT’s Objection, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objection fails to show that dismissal is appropriate. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES QGT’s Objection and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. It is therefore ORDERED that QGT’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 27th day of March, 2020.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Kipb LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:19-cv-00056 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2020).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_19-cv-00056-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_19-cv-00056-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case