Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Uniloc 2017 LLC et al v. Google LLC, No. 2:18-cv-00499 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2020)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00499, Dkt. No. 197
Decided
March 20, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

UNILOC 2017 LLC, §

§

Plaintiffs,

§

Case No. 2:18-cv-00499-JRG-RSP v. §

§

GOOGLE LLC,

§

Defendants. § SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM AND

ORDER

The Court previously entered a Claim Construction Memorandum and Order (“CCMO”) on January 20, 2020. Dkt. No. 152. This CCMO construed the term “short-range wireless technology” to mean “wireless personal area network technology.” Dkt. No. 152 at 45–50. While the CCMO did not expressly exclude Wi-Fi technology from the scope of this claim term, the reasoning within the CCMO indicated that “short-range wireless technology” did not include Wi-Fi technology. Id. at 48–49. For example, the CCMO stated that “[t]he disclosures regarding ‘short-range wireless technology’ between a mobile device and a stationary terminal thus contrast with the disclosure of ‘access to the Internet’ using WiFi.” Id. at 49.

The Court now enters this Supplemental Order to modify the construction for this term. The Court now construes “short-range wireless technology” to mean “wireless personal area network technology (which excludes, for example, Wi-Fi technology).” The Court alters this construction to eliminate any ambiguity as to whether Wi-Fi technology falls within the scope of this claim term.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Uniloc 2017 LLC et al v. Google LLC, No. 2:18-cv-00499 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2020).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_18-cv-00499-2
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_18-cv-00499-2

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.