E.D. Tex.

Tsann Kuen (Zhangzhou) Enterprise Co., Ltd. v. Huayu Electrical appliance Group Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:18-cv-00489 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 22, 2019)

General / Procedural

Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.: No. 2:18-cv-00489, Dkt. No. 13
Decided: January 22, 2019
Judge: Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document: Order
Docket Entry: ORDER - granting 15 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice
Length: 1 page

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

TSANN KUEN (ZHANGZHOU) §

ENTERPRISE CO., LTD., §

§ §

Plaintiff,

§ §

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-CV-00489-JRG

§ §

HUAYU ELECTRICAL APPLIANCE

GROUP CO., LTD., TARGET

CORPORATION, TARGET BRANDS,

INC.,

§ Defendants. §

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Tsann Kuen (Zhangzhou) Enterprise Co., Ltd.’s (“Zhangzhou”) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) (the “Notice”). (Dkt. No. 15.) In light of the Notice and being advised that Defendants Huayu Electrical Appliance Group Co., Ltd., Target Corporation, and Target Brands, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) have not filed answers or motions for summary judgment, it is hereby ORDERED that Zhangzhou’s claims in this case against Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the above-referenced case.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Tsann Kuen (Zhangzhou) Enterprise Co., Ltd. v. Huayu Electrical appliance Group Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:18-cv-00489 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 22, 2019).

govinfo ID: USCOURTS-txed-2_18-cv-00489-0
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_18-cv-00489-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error