IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
ULTRAVISION TECHNOLOGIES, §
LLC, §
§
Plaintiff, §
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-cv-100-JRG-RSP v. §
LEAD CASE
§
GOVISION, LLC, §
§
Defendant. §
§
ULTRAVISION TECHNOLOGIES, §
LLC, §
§
Plaintiff, §
§
v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-cv-108-JRG-RSP
§ CONSOLIDATED CASE
PRISMAFLEX INTERNATIONAL §
FRANCE S.A., §
§
Defendant. §
§
ORDER
Defendant Prismaflex International, S.A. (“PI”) previously filed a Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. No. 93.) Magistrate Judge Payne filed a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Motion to Dismiss be denied in all respects. (Dkt. No. 219.) PI has filed Objections to the R&R. (Dkt. No. 231.)
After reviewing the briefing for the Motion to Dismiss, Judge Payne’s R&R, and PI’s Objections, the Court agrees with the conclusions reached within the R&R. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Defendants’ Objections and ADOPTS the R&R. It is therefore ORDERED that PI’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.
2So Ordered this Mar 28, 2020
