Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Huawei Device USA, Inc. et al, No. 2:17-cv-00736 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 7, 2019)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00736, Dkt. No. 77
Decided
January 7, 2019
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 72 Report and Recommendations
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

UNILOC USA, INC. ET AL, §

§

Plaintiffs, §

§ No. 2:17-CV-00736-JRG-RSP v. §

§

HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC. ET §

AL, §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

Before the Court are Defendants' Objections (Dkt. No. 75) to Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 72), which recommended the denial of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 32). After reviewing Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation and the objections made by Defendants, the undersigned overrules the Defendants’ objections and adopts Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 32) is therefore denied.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Huawei Device USA, Inc. et al, No. 2:17-cv-00736 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 7, 2019).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_17-cv-00736-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_17-cv-00736-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.