§ v. § Case No. 2:17-CV-00328-JRG-RSP (Lead) § BASKIN-ROBBINS FRANCHISING, §
LLC, BASKIN-ROBBINS FRANCHISED §
SHOPS, LLC §
ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Payne, recommending that Defendants’ motions to dismiss be granted. (Dkt. No. 52.) Having reviewed the objections filed by Mantis Communications, LLC (“Mantis”), and having considered the Report and Recommendation de novo, the Court finds no reason to reject or modify the recommended disposition. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
Accordingly, It is ORDERED: (1) The motions to dismiss are GRANTED.1 (2) Mantis’s lawsuits should be dismissed for failure to state a claim.
Footnotes
↩1 Case No. 2:17-cv-000328, Dkts. 11 & 20 Case No. 2:17-cv-000324, Dkt. 11 Case No. 2:17-cv-000325, Dkts. 9 & 15 Case No. 2:17-cv-000327, Dkt. 12 Case No. 2:17-cv-000339, Dkt. 16
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
Mantis Communications, LLC v. Baskin-Robbins Franchising, LLC et al, No. 2:17-cv-00328 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 17, 2017).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.