Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Better Mouse Company, LLC v. Razer USA Ltd. d/b/a Razer, Inc., No. 2:17-cv-00317 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 6, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00317, Dkt. No. 25
Decided
September 6, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 24 Report and Recommendations, denying without prejudice 18 Razer's motion to dismiss
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

BETTER MOUSE COMPANY, LLC, §

§ v. § Case No. 2:17-CV-00317-JRG-RSP (Lead) § RAZER USA LTD. D/B/A RAZER, INC. §

ORDER

Judge Payne issued a Report and Recommendation, which recommended denying Razer’s motion to dismiss for improper venue without prejudice. The Report and Recommendation was filed on August 16, 2017, and the parties had until August 30, 2017, to file any objections. No objections were filed, and the time to do so has now passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2).

Accordingly, It is ORDERED: (1) Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation, Dkt. 24, is ADOPTED. (2) Razer’s motion to dismiss, Dkt. 18, is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Better Mouse Company, LLC v. Razer USA Ltd. d/b/a Razer, Inc., No. 2:17-cv-00317 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 6, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_17-cv-00317-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_17-cv-00317-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.