IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
OPTIS WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY, LLC, §
PANOPTIS PATENT MANAGEMENT, §
LLC, OPTIS CELLULAR § Case No. 2:17-cv-00123-JRG-RSP TECHNOLOGY, LLC., §
§ Plaintiffs, § § v. § § HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD., §
HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC., HUAWEI §
DEVICE CO. LTD., §
§ Defendants. §
ORDER
Before the court is the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Payne, which recommends that Plaintiffs’ motion for an anti-suit injunction be denied without prejudice. ECF No. 137. For dispositive matters referred to a magistrate judge, the district court must “determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). “The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommend disposition.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). No objections have been filed, and the time to do so has now passed. Accordingly, upon de novo review, the report and recommendation is ADOPTED, and Plaintiffs’ motion for an anti-suit injunction, ECF No. 76, is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.