IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLC, §
§ Plaintiff, § Case No. 2:17-CV-00105-JRG-RSP § v. § § ROBERT BOSCH GMBH, §
§ Defendant. §
§
ORDER
The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Now before the Court is the Report & Recommendation [Dkt. No. 44] by Magistrate Judge Payne, which recommends that Defendant Robert Bosch GmbH’s Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No. 12] be denied without prejudice to filing a renewed motion in light of Plaintiff Blitzsafe Texas, LLC’s amended complaint [Dkt. No. 38]. No party has objected to the Report & Recommendation. .
Having reviewed Magistrate Judge Payne’s report, Defendant’s motion and reply [Dkt. No. 32], and Plaintiff’s response [Dkt. No. 19] and sur-reply [Dkt. No. 36], the Court concludes Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report & Recommendation [Dkt. No. 44] is correct. The Report & Recommendation [Dkt. No. 44] is hereby ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No. 12] is DENIED without prejudice to filing a renewed motion in light of the amended complaint.
SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 7th day of February, 2019.