IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
ARALEZ PHARMACEUTICALS INC., §
ARALEZ PHARMACEUTICALS §
TRADING DAC, ARALEZ § Case No. 2:17-CV-00071-JRG-RSP PHARMACEUTICALS US INC., POZEN §
INC., §
§ Plaintiffs, § § v. § § TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., §
§ Defendants. §
ORDER
The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Payne on July 17, 2017 (Dkt. No. 64) recommending that Defendant Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “Teva”) Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue (Dkt. No. 38) be denied. Defendant Teva has filed an objection seeking reconsideration of the Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. No. 67.) The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation de novo and finds no reason to reject or modify the recommended disposition. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Davidson v. Georgia-Pac., L.L.C., 819 F.3d 758, 762 (5th Cir. 2016); United States v. Toney, No. 16-CR-43-JPS, 2016 WL 3945358, at *1 (E.D. Wis. July 19, 2016) (noting that a motion to dismiss for improper venue is a dispositive motion), aff'd sub nom. United States v. Haslage, 853 F.3d 331 (7th Cir. 2017).
2Accordingly, it is ORDERED: (1) Teva’s objections (Dkt. No. 67) are OVERRULED. (2) Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 64) is ADOPTED. (3) Teva’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 38) is DENIED.