§ Plaintiff, § Case No. 2:16-CV-01417-JRG-RSP § v. § § ZODIAC AEROSPACE, et al., § § Defendants. §
ORDER .
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Payne on April 17, 2017 (Dkt. No. 150) recommending that B/E Aerospace, Inc’s (“B/E”) Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 25) be denied. Having considered the objections filed by B/E (Dkt. No. 162) and finding them to be without sufficient merit, and after a de novo review, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. B/E’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 14) is DENIED.1
SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.So ORDERED and SIGNED this 2nd day of May, 2017.
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Footnotes
↩1 B/E’s objections suggest that “unaddressed facts and arguments it presented were accepted in the R&R.” Dkt. No. 162 at 1. The Court disagrees. The findings and conclusions of law made by the Report and Recommendation and adopted herein are limited to those expressly described in the Report and Recommendation.
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
B/E aerospace, Inc. v. Zodiac aerospace et al, No. 2:16-cv-01417 (E.D. Tex. May 2, 2017).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.