Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

MyMail, Ltd. v. Yahoo!, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-01000 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 15, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-01000, Dkt. No. 127
Decided
August 15, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 110 Report and Recommendation. MyMails Motion (Dkt. No. 65) and Yahoos Motion (Dkt. No. 74) are DENIED as MOOT
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

MYMAIL, LTD., § §

Plaintiff, § § v. § NO. 2:16-CV-01000-JRG-RSP § YAHOO!, INC., § §

Defendant. §

ORDER

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Before the Court are various recommendations by Magistrate Judge Payne. R. & R. (Dkt. No. 110). Neither party has filed objections to these recommendations.

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, IT IS ORDERED Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 110) recommending denial of MyMail’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 65) and denial of Yahoo’s Motion Pursuant to Rule 56(d) (Dkt. No. 74) are hereby ADOPTED. MyMail’s Motion (Dkt. No. 65) and Yahoo’s Motion (Dkt. No. 74) are therefore both DENIED as MOOT.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

MyMail, Ltd. v. Yahoo!, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-01000 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 15, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-01000-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-01000-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.