Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Autumn Cloud LLC v. TripAdvisor, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00853 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 4, 2018)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00853, Dkt. No. 118
Decided
January 4, 2018
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 114 Report and Recommendation
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

AUTUMN CLOUD LLC, §

§ Plaintiff, § Case No. 2:16-cv-00853-JRG-RSP (Lead) § v. § Case No. 2:16-cv-00850-JRG-RSP (Member) § PINTEREST, INC., §

§ Defendant. §

ORDER

Before the Court is the report and recommendation from Magistrate Judge Payne, which recommends that Pinterest, Inc. be dismissed without prejudice for improper venue. Dkt. No. 114. No objections have been filed, and the time to do so has now passed. Upon de novo review of the report and recommendation, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation without modification. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Accordingly, Pinterest, Inc.’s motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 76, is GRANTED. The lawsuit against Pinterest is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Autumn Cloud LLC v. TripAdvisor, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00853 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 4, 2018).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00853-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00853-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.