Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Autumn Cloud LLC v. Radio One, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00841 (E.D. Tex. May 11, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00841, Dkt. No. 20
Decided
May 11, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 13 Report and Recommendations, granting 10 Motion to Dismiss. Autumn Clouds action against Interactive One, LLC is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 4(m). The Scheduling…
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

AUTUMN CLOUD LLC, §

§ Plaintiff, § Case No. 2:16-CV-00841-JRG-RSP § v. § § INTERACTIVE ONE, LLC, §

§ Defendant. §

ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Payne on March 12, 2017 (Dkt. No. 13), recommending Interactive One, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Serve Complaint (Dkt. No. 10) be granted.1 The Report and Recommendation provided Autumn Cloud fourteen days to file objections. See (Dkt. No. 13.) No objections were timely filed.

On March 28, 2017, a day after the objection-period had expired, Autumn Cloud informed the Court that “the summons and complaint were served . . . [on] March 27, 2017.” (Dkt. No. 18.) Service was made to John Weaver at 805 3rd Ave, Suite 1055, New York, NY 10022. (Dkt. No. 16-1; Dkt. No. 17.) However, Interactive One, LLC has indicated that it does not have an employee or agent named John Weaver and it does not have an office at 805 3rd Ave in New York. (Dkt. No. 18.) Accordingly, because Interactive One, LLC has not been properly served, the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13) is ADOPTED. Interactive One, LLC’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 10) is GRANTED.

2.

Autumn Cloud’s action against Interactive One, LLC is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 4(m). The Scheduling Order entered on May 1, 2017 is VACATED, and the clerk is directed to close this case.

SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 11th day of May, 2017.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Footnotes

  1. 1 This Report and Recommendation was entered nineteen days after the Court ordered Autumn Cloud to “file proof that Interactive One, LLC has been served with the complaint within fourteen days . . . .” (Dkt. No. 12.) No such proof has been filed.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Autumn Cloud LLC v. Radio One, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00841 (E.D. Tex. May 11, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00841-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00841-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.