§ v. § Case No. 2:16-CV-00607-JRG-RSP § BLUESTONE NATURAL RESOURCES II, §
LLC §
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Payne issued a report recommending that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment be denied. No objections were filed, and the time to do so has now passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Having considered the Report and Recommendation de novo, the Court finds no reason to reject or modify the recommended disposition. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
Accordingly, It is ORDERED: (1) The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Dkt. 124, is ADOPTED. (2) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, Dkt. 51, is DENIED.
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
Effective Exploration, LLC v. Bluestone Natural Resources II, LLC, No. 2:16-cv-00607 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 22, 2017).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.