§ Plaintiff, § § No. 2:16-CV-00586-JRG-RSP v. § (lead case) § No. 2:16-CV-00964-JRG-RSP MUSIC CHOICE, §
§ Defendants. §
ORDER
The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Now before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 119) by Magistrate Judge Payne, which recommends that Music Choice’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 62) be denied. Neither party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Having considered the Report, IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 119) is hereby ADOPTED. Music Choice’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 62) is therefore DENIED.
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
Music Choice v. Stingray Digital Group Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00586 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 6, 2017).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.