Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Bytemark, Inc. v. Masabi Ltd., No. 2:16-cv-00543 (E.D. Tex. May 17, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00543, Dkt. No. 66
Decided
May 17, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 58 Report and Recommendations, Denying 39 Motion to Dismiss
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

BYTEMARK, INC., §

§ Plaintiff, § Case No. 2:16-CV-00543-JRG-RSP § v. § § MASABI LTD., §

§ Defendant. §

§

ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Payne on April 28, 2017, Dkt. No. 58, recommending that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Dkt. No. 39, be denied. No objections have been filed. Accordingly, and after a de novo review, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 39, is DENIED.

So Ordered this May 17, 2017

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Bytemark, Inc. v. Masabi Ltd., No. 2:16-cv-00543 (E.D. Tex. May 17, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00543-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00543-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case