Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Theta IP, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00527 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 6, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00527, Dkt. No. 109
Decided
September 6, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 108 Report and Recommendations denying 58 Theta's motion to dimiss
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

THETA IP, LLC, §

§ v. § Case No. 2:16-CV-00527-JRG-RSP § SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et § al. §

ORDER

Judge Payne issued a Report and Recommendation, which recommended denying Theta IP, LLC’s (“Theta”) motion to dismiss Samsung’s counterclaim. The Report and Recommendation was filed on August 17, 2017, and the parties had until August 31, 2017, to file any objections. No objections were filed, and the time to do so has now passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2).

Accordingly, It is ORDERED: (1) Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation, Dkt. 108, is ADOPTED. (2) Theta’s motion to dismiss, Dkt. 58, is DENIED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Theta IP, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00527 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 6, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00527-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00527-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.