HUAWEI DEVICE USA INC., et al., § Case No. 2:16-cv-437-JRG-RSP (Lead)
§
MEDIATEK INC., MEDIATEK USA INC. § Case No. 2:16-cv-438-JRG-RSP
§
STMICROELECTRONICS INC., § Case No. 2:16-cv-439-JRG-RSP STMICROELECTRONICS N.V. §
§ Case No. 2:16-cv-440-JRG-RSP
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC. §
§
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Payne on February 21, 2017 (Dkt. No. 73) recommending denial of Dkt. No. 20 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00437 (Huawei’s motion); Dkt. No. 22 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00439 (STMicroelectronics’s motion); Dkt. No. 19 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00438 (MediaTek’s motion); and Dkt. No. 17 in Case No. 2:16-00440 (Texas Instruments’ motion) (collectively, “the Motions”). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Motions, and the subsequent Objections filed by Defendants (Dkt. Nos. 78, 79). The Court finds the Objections to be without suf ficient merit. The Recommendation is adopted.
IT IS ORDERED that the Motions are DENIED.
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
Semcon IP Inc. v. Huawei Device USA Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00437 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 15, 2017).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.