Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Raytheon Company v. Cray, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00423 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 12, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00423, Dkt. No. 74
Decided
April 12, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 71 Report and Recommendations, denying 23 Motion to Dismiss
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

RAYTHEON COMPANY, §

§ Plaintiff, § Case No. 2:16-CV-00423-JRG-RSP § v. § § CRAY, INC., §

§ Defendant. §

ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Payne on March 13, 2017 (Dkt. No. 71) recommending that Defendant Cray Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3) and 12(b)(6) (Dkt. No. 23) be denied. Having considered the objections filed by Defendant Cray Inc. (Dkt. No. 72) and finding them to be without sufficient merit, and after a de novo review, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant Cray Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 23) is hereby DENIED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Raytheon Company v. Cray, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00423 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 12, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00423-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00423-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.