ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 161 Report and Recommendations, 66 Motion to Dismiss, filed by The Lamar Company, L.L.C., Lamar Texas Limited Partnership, Lamar Media Corporation, Lamar Advertising Company
§ Plaintiff, § Case No. 2:16-CV-00374-JRG-RSP § v. § § LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY et al., § § Defendants. §
§
ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Payne on February 21, 2017 (Dkt. No. 162) recommending that Lamar’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Dkt. No. 91) be denied. Having considered Lamar’s objections and finding them to be without sufficient merit, and after a de novo review, the Recommendation is ADOPTED.
IT IS ORDERED that Lamar’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 66) is DENIED.
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Lamar advertising Company et al, No. 2:16-cv-00374 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 10, 2017).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.