Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

PerdiemCo, LLC. v. Industrack LLC, No. 2:15-cv-00727 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 2, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-00727, Dkt. No. 279
Decided
November 2, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 253 Report and Recommendations. ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing (Dkt. 198) is DENIED
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

PERDIEMCO, LLC., §

§ Plaintiff, § Case No. 2:15-CV-00727-JRG-RSP § v. § § INDUSTRACK LLC, §

§ Defendant. §

§

PERDIEMCO LLC, §

§ Plaintiff, § Case No. 2:15-CV-00726-JRG-RSP § v. § § GEOTAB INC., GEOTAB USA, INC., §

§ Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Payne (Dkt. 253) recommending denial of Defendant Geotab’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing (Dkt. 198). Having considered the Objections filed by Geotab (Dkt. 275) and finding them to be without sufficient merit, the Recommendation is adopted.

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing (Dkt. 198) is DENIED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

PerdiemCo, LLC. v. Industrack LLC, No. 2:15-cv-00727 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 2, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_15-cv-00727-4
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_15-cv-00727-4

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.