Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Parthenon Unified Memory architecture LLC v. apple Inc., No. 2:15-cv-00621 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-00621, Dkt. No. 204
Decided
August 9, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J. — Marshall
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

PARTHENON UNIFIED MEMORY §

ARCHITECTURE LLC §

§

Case No. 2:15-CV-621-JRG-RSP

v. § § APPLE, INC. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Currently before the Court is Apple Inc.’s Motion for Leave to Join Acacia Research Group and Acacia Research Corporation (Dkt. No. 85). Apple moves the Court to order Plaintiff to join the Acacia entities as additional plaintiffs. Apple’s primary argument is that the Acacia entities are the alter egos of Plaintiff. Apple argues that Plaintiff is undercapitalized and that Apple might be unable to collect any fees and costs it might be awarded against Plaintiff at the end of the litigation.

Plaintiff has persuasively responded that it is not undercapitalized. Moreover, Apple’s motion is premature, as it has not obtained any award of fees and costs in this matter, let alone shown that Plaintiff cannot pay the award. Apple can seek recovery against the Acacia entities when and if such events occur. It would needlessly complicate these proceedings to join the Acacia entities at this juncture. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Parthenon Unified Memory architecture LLC v. apple Inc., No. 2:15-cv-00621 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_15-cv-00621-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_15-cv-00621-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.