Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Nonend Inventions, N.V. v. apple Inc., No. 2:15-cv-00466 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2016)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-00466, Dkt. No. 647
Decided
March 30, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 640 Report and Recommendations, granted-in-part and denied-in-part 202 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs Willful Infringement Claims in the First Amended Complaint filed by Motorola Mobility LLC
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

NONEND INVENTIONS, N.V., § §

Plaintiff, § § v. § Case No. 2:15-cv-466-JRG-RSP § APPLE. INC., ET AL., § §

Defendants. §

ORDER

Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. No. 646.) The Report (Dkt. No. 640) recommended finding that Plaintiff did not state a claim for pre-suit willful infringement. The Court has reviewed the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation de novo and finds the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 640) should be ADOPTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 646) are OVERRULED and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 202) is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Nonend Inventions, N.V. v. apple Inc., No. 2:15-cv-00466 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_15-cv-00466-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_15-cv-00466-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.