Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Ericsson Inc. et al v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings, Ltd. et al, No. 2:15-cv-00011 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 29, 2015)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-00011, Dkt. No. 192
Decided
December 29, 2015
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J. — Marshall
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

ERICSSON INC., AND

TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM

ERICSSON,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 2:15-cv-00011-RSP

v. TCL COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY

HOLDINGS, LTD., TCT MOBILE

LIMITED, AND TCT MOBILE (US), INC.,

Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER

Currently before the Court is the Joint Motion for Determination of Reasonable Expenses, Including Attorney’s Fees (Dkt. No. 180) filed by the parties on December 8, 2015, seeking a ruling from the Court on the amount of fees and expenses related to the Court’s September 8, 2015 Order shifting costs to the Defendants on Plaintiffs’ successful motion to compel. After a review of the record, including the billing records submitted by Plaintiffs for in camera inspection, the Court finds that the rates and hours requested are reasonable and are not disproportionate to the issues involved in the motion to compel. The Court has made an adjustment based on the appearance that there is some duplication involved in the multiple attorneys involved in the motion. While this is a reasonable and customary practice, some adjustment is necessary based on the jurisprudence under Rule 37. Accordingly,

2IT IS ORDERED that Defendants pay to Plaintiffs, through their counsel, the sum of $35, 172.00 as the reasonable fees and expenses incurred in connection with the foregoing motion.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Ericsson Inc. et al v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings, Ltd. et al, No. 2:15-cv-00011 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 29, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_15-cv-00011-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_15-cv-00011-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.