Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

SynQor Inc. v. Vicor Corporation, No. 2:14-cv-00287 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 6, 2022)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00287, Dkt. No. 637
Decided
October 6, 2022
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J. — Texarkana
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 568 Report and Recommendations 389 Sealed Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Undisputed Claim Limitations, filed by SynQor Inc
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYNQOR, INC., §

§

Plaintiff,

§ §

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-CV-00287-RWS-

§

JBB

VICOR CORPORATION, §

§ Defendants. §

§

ORDER

The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Before the Court is the September 16, 2022 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 568), which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of SynQor’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Undisputed Claim Limitations (Docket No. 389).

The Magistrate Judge found that SynQor had not carried its burden in proving that there was no question of fact as to whether the accused products met a specified subset of claim limitations and recommended that SynQor’s motion be denied. See generally, Docket No. 389. The deadline for the parties to file objections was October 3, 2022. Failure to provide written objections bars a party from de novo review, and unobjected to findings and conclusions are reviewed by the District Court for clear error. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3); Warren v. Miles, 230 F.3d 688, 694 (5th Cir. 2000).

No objections have been filed. After a review of the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation, the Court finds no clearly erroneous factual findings and legal conclusions.

2.

Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that SynQor’s Motion for Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Undisputed Claim Limitations (Docket No. 389) is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 6th day of October, 2022.

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

SynQor Inc. v. Vicor Corporation, No. 2:14-cv-00287 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 6, 2022).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_14-cv-00287-11
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_14-cv-00287-11

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.