Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

C-Cation Technologies, LLC v. Time Warner Cable Inc., et al, No. 2:14-cv-00059 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 4, 2018)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00059, Dkt. No. 185
Decided
January 4, 2018
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 184 Order, Memorandum & Opinion, Report and Recommendations
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

C-CATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, §

§ Plaintiff, § Case No. 2:14-cv-00059-JRG-RSP § v. § § TIME WARNER CABLE INC., et al., § § Defendants. §

ORDER

Before the Court is the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Payne, recommending that C-Cation’s complaint be dismissed with prejudice following the Patent Office’s finding that all asserted patent claims are invalid, and the Federal Circuit’s affirmance of this finding. See Dkt. No. 184. No objections have been filed, and the time to do so has now passed. Upon de novo review of the report and recommendation, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation without modification. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Accordingly, the motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 173, is GRANTED. This lawsuit is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

C-Cation Technologies, LLC v. Time Warner Cable Inc., et al, No. 2:14-cv-00059 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 4, 2018).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_14-cv-00059-3
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_14-cv-00059-3

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.