§ Plaintiff, § § v. § Case No. 2:13-cv-947-JRG-RSP § LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM §
U.S.A., INC., § § Defendant. §
ORDER
Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. No. 236.) The Report (Dkt. No. 216) recommended finding that Defendant was covered by a provision of an agreement between Plaintiff and T-Mobile, a third-party to this suit. The Court has reviewed the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation de novo and finds that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 216) should be ADOPTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 236) are OVERRULED and Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 185) is DENIED.
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc., No. 2:13-cv-00947 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 8, 2016).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.