Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Scott Environmental Services, Inc. v. a to Z Mud Co., Inc., No. 2:13-cv-00701 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 5, 2014)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00701, Dkt. No. 43
Decided
February 5, 2014
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SCOTT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, §

INC., §

§ Plaintiff, § §

Case No. 2:13-CV-701-JRG-RSP

v. § § A TO Z MUD CO., INC., §

§ Defendant.

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant A to Z Mud Co., Inc.’s “Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and Alternative Motion for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e)” (Dkt. No. 13, filed November 12, 2013.) The Magistrate Judge filed a report recommending that the motions be denied. (Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 31, filed January 16, 2014).

No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation were filed. The Court finds that the Report and Recommendation should be, and is hereby, ADOPTED. Accordingly, A to Z’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and Alternative Motion for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e) is DENIED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Scott Environmental Services, Inc. v. a to Z Mud Co., Inc., No. 2:13-cv-00701 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 5, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_13-cv-00701-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_13-cv-00701-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case