Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

DataQuill Limited v. Huawei Technologies Co Ltd et al, No. 2:13-cv-00633 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 3, 2014)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00633, Dkt. No. 89
Decided
November 3, 2014
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 88 Motion to Stay Pending Settlement
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

DATAQUILL LIMITED §

§

v. § Case No. 2:13-cv-00633-JRG-RSP § HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO LTD et al §

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff DataQuill Limited (“DataQuill”) and Defendants Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.; Huawei Technologies USA, Inc.; Huawei Device Co. Ltd.; Huawei Device, USA, Inc.; and Futurewei Technologies, Inc., (“Huawei Defendants”) Joint Motion to Stay All Pending Deadlines and Notice of Settlement (Dkt. No. 88, filed November 3, 2014). The Court, having considered the moving parties’ present motion and their specific statement that the parties “have reached, in principal, a settlement agreement that resolves all matters in this controversy between them,” finds that the motion should be GRANTED-IN-PART, as follows:

    • IT IS ORDERED that the deadlines between the moving parties are stayed until December 2, 2014 pending final settlement; and
    • IT IS ORDERED that, if the moving parties have not filed a joint motion to dismiss after December 2, 2014, counsel for the moving parties will appear for a hearing before the Court on Thursday, December 4, 2014, at 1:00 p.m. AS AN ADDITIONAL MATTER, while the Huawei Defendants are free to decline to participate in the Claim Construction Hearing set for November 4, 2014, they should be aware

2that they will be bound by the result of that hearing in the event that their settlement is not ultimately consummated.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

DataQuill Limited v. Huawei Technologies Co Ltd et al, No. 2:13-cv-00633 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 3, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_13-cv-00633-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_13-cv-00633-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.