Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Telecommunications america, LLC, No. 2:13-cv-00259 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 11, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00259, Dkt. No. 82
Decided
December 11, 2014
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J. — Marshall
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS §

TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, §

Plaintiff, §

v. §

Case No. 2:13-cv-259-RSP

SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS §

AMERICA, LLC, §

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Before the Court is MTEL’s Motion for Relief from Exclusion Order (Dkt. 69, the “Motion”). MTEL asks this Court to permit introduction of the “NFR” document that it failed to timely disclose. For the reasons set forth in the Court’s prior rulings on this issue, MTEL’s request is DENIED. (10/20 Tr. at 41:1-21; 11/7 Tr. at 50:18-21.) The Court notes, however, that it may revisit its ruling if Samsung opens the door to the topic. (See, e.g., 11/7 Tr. at 50:18-21.)

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Telecommunications america, LLC, No. 2:13-cv-00259 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 11, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_13-cv-00259-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_13-cv-00259-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.