IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
LIGHT TRANSFORMATION §
TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, §
§ v. § Case No. 2:12-CV-826-MHS-RSP § LIGHT SCIENCE GROUP CORP., et al., §
ORDER
Before the Court is Defendant GE Lighting (“GE”)’s Renewed 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Case No. 2:12-CV-827, Dkt. No. 15, filed April 4, 2013). The Magistrate Judge filed a report recommending that the motion be denied. (Report and Rec. ommendation, No. 72, filed March 3, 2014).
No objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation has been filed. The Court finds that the Report and Recommendation should be, and is hereby, ADOPTED. Accordingly, GE’s Renewed 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Case No. 2:12-CV-827, Dkt. No. 15) is DENIED.
It is SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 26th day of March, 2014.