Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

TQP Development, LLC v. Callidus Software, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00799 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 9, 2013)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00799, Dkt. No. 31
Decided
September 9, 2013
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Denying 19 Motion to Dismiss
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

TQP DEVELOPMENT, LLC, §

§ Plaintiff, § § v. § Case No. 2:12-CV-799-JRG-RSP § CALLIDUS SOFTWARE INC., §

§ Defendant. §

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Callidus Software Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 19, filed February 25, 2013). The Magistrate Judge filed a report recommending that the motion be denied. (Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 29).

After reviewing the objected to portions of the Report and Recommendation de novo, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation should be, and is hereby, ADOPTED. Accordingly, Callidus Software Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 19) is DENIED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

TQP Development, LLC v. Callidus Software, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00799 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 9, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_12-cv-00799-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_12-cv-00799-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error