Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

DietGoal Innovations LLC v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00764 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 24, 2014)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00764, Dkt. No. 99
Decided
October 24, 2014
Judge
William C. Bryson, J. (sitting by designation)
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

DIETGOAL INNOVATIONS LLC, §

§ Plaintiff, § CIVIL ACTION NO. § v. § 2:12-cv-00764-WCB-RSP

§ CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC., §

§ Defendant. § §

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.; Doctor’s Associates, Inc. d/b/a Subway; Marco’s Franchising, LLC; Red Robin International, Inc.; Tyson Foods, Inc.; Genghis Grill Franchise Concepts, LP; and Whataburger Restaurants LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) Unopposed Motion to Amend Post-Judgment Deadline for Submission of Their Respective Bills of Costs. Dkt. No. 98. The motion is GRANTED. The deadline for submission of their respective Bills of Costs is extended from November 3, 2014, to November 14, 2014. IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 24th day of October, 2014.

WILLIAM C. BRYSON

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

DietGoal Innovations LLC v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00764 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 24, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_12-cv-00764-3
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_12-cv-00764-3

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.