Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

TQP Development, LLC v. Yelp Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00656 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 5, 2013)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00656, Dkt. No. 40
Decided
September 5, 2013
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 37 Report and Recommendations, that Yelp Inc.s Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State a Claim and to Strike (Dkt. No. 15) is DENIED
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

TQP DEVELOPMENT, LLC, §

§ Plaintiff, § § v. § Case No. 2:12-CV-656-JRG-RSP § YELP INC., §

§ Defendant. §

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Yelp Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State a Claim and to Strike (Dkt. No. 15, filed November 9, 2012). The Magistrate Judge filed a report recommending that the motion be denied. (Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 37).

After reviewing the objected to portions of the Report and Recommendation de novo, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation should be, and is hereby, ADOPTED. Accordingly, Yelp Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State a Claim and to Strike (Dkt. No. 15) is DENIED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

TQP Development, LLC v. Yelp Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00656 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 5, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_12-cv-00656-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_12-cv-00656-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case