Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. Borets Weatherford U.S., Inc. et al, No. 2:12-cv-00613 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 11, 2013)

Denied
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00613, Dkt. No. 59
Decided
September 11, 2013
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - denying 13 Motion to Dismiss
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY §

CORPORATION §

§ Plaintiff, § § v. § Case No. 2:12-CV-613-JRG-RSP § BORETS WETHERFORD U.S., INC. et al., § § Defendants. §

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Weatherford International Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted (Dkt. No. 13, filed December 24, 2012). The Magistrate Judge filed a report recommending that the motion be denied. (Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 56, filed September 23, 2013). No objections having been filed and for the reasons set forth in the Court’s Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED.

Accordingly, Weatherford’s Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted (Dkt. No. 13) is DENIED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. Borets Weatherford U.S., Inc. et al, No. 2:12-cv-00613 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 11, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_12-cv-00613-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_12-cv-00613-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error