Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Cardsoft (assignment for the Benefit of Creditors), LLC v. The Gores Group, LLC et al, No. 2:12-cv-00325 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2013)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Motion to Dismiss Induced Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00325, Dkt. No. 82
Decided
September 30, 2013
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting 69 Report and Recommendations, granting in part and denying in part 19 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Equinox Payments LLC, The Gore Group LLC
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

CARDSOFT (ASSIGNMENT FOR THE §

BENEFIT OF CREDITORS), LLC, §

§ Plaintiff, § § v. § Case No. 2:12-CV-325-JRG-RSP § THE GORES GROUP, LLC, and EQUINOX § PAYMENTS, LLC., §

Defendants.

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants Equinox Payments, LLC and The Gores Group LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State a Claim (Dkt. No. 19, filed January 1, 2013.) The Magistrate Judge filed a report recommending that the motion be denied (Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 69.)

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and there being no timely objections, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation should be, and is hereby, ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State a Claim (Dkt. No. 19) is DENIED-IN-PART as it relates to Plaintiff’s claim of inducement and GRANTED-IN-PART as it relates to Plaintiff’s claims of contributory indirect infringement.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Cardsoft (assignment for the Benefit of Creditors), LLC v. The Gores Group, LLC et al, No. 2:12-cv-00325 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_12-cv-00325-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_12-cv-00325-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case