Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

SynQor, Inc. et al v. artesyn Technologies, Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00444 (E.D. Tex. June 12, 2012)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00444, Dkt. No. 126
Decided
June 12, 2012
Judge
Michael H. Schneider, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 123
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYNQOR, INC. §

Plaintiff § §

V. § No. 2:11CV444 § ARTESYN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., §

ET AL. §

Defendants §

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report of the Magistrate Judge which contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action has been presented for consideration. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation. The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that SynQor, Inc.’s Emergency Motion for Order Requiring Non-Party Cisco Systems, Inc. to Show Cause Why it Should Not Be Held in Contempt of the Permanent Injunction Entered by the Court (Dkt. No. 2) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILING.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

SynQor, Inc. et al v. artesyn Technologies, Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00444 (E.D. Tex. June 12, 2012).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_11-cv-00444-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_11-cv-00444-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.