Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al v. United Module Corp. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00331 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 17, 2011)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00331
Decided
February 17, 2011
Judge
Document
Order (scanned)
Docket Entry
ORDER granting 19 Application of Paul A. Gennari for Admission Pro Hac Vice representing Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc
Length
1 page

<pagelD>

e w

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

4 H / Wie

0 4 & N

Y IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC

W T COURT “fey

C4, CAO

P

B “lig? p

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA My A

B

D

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CoO., LTD., 11-00430 hk FS CASE NO, C

SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.

o O

Plaintiff, (repesed)

oO ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION

Vv. FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY UNITED MODULE CORP. and PRO HAC VICE KERANOS LLC,

e ll Defendant. tr uo C

aimro filaC f o

Paul A. Gennari , whose business address and telephone number is tc irt siD tcir tsiD Steptoe & Johnson LLP, 1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.,,

Washington, DC 20036-1795, Tel. (202) 429-6413 se t meh at troN S e ht

and who is an active member in good standing of the bar of USDC ED. Texas ro F mm

m

detinU having applied in the above-entitled action for admission to practice in the Northern District of

m r

California on a pro hac vice basis, representing Plaintiffs. m o

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and D

RB

conditions of Civil L.R, 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac O

R

vice. Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application Q

OR

K

will constitute notice to the party. All future filings in this action are subject to the requirements I

R

B

contained in General Order No. 45, Electronic Case Filing. N

B

b B

Dated: February 17, 2011 b B

United Stes District Judge N

W

o N

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al v. United Module Corp. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00331 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 17, 2011).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_11-cv-00331-3
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_11-cv-00331-3

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.