Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Callpod, Inc. v. T Technology, Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00326 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 23, 2013)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00326, Dkt. No. 141
Decided
August 23, 2013
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER - Defendants are directed to file their response to Plaintiffs Opposed Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice Defendants Counterclaims and for Entry of Judgment and Costs (Dkt. No. 130). Deadline set for August 28, 2013
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

CALLPOD, INC., §

§ v. § Case No. 2:11-CV-326-JRG-RSP § T TECHNOLOGY, INC., et al., §

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Opposed Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice Defendants’ Counterclaims and for Entry of Judgment and Costs (Dkt. No. 130). Defendants are directed to file their response, if any, no later than August 28, 2013.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Callpod, Inc. v. T Technology, Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00326 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 23, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_11-cv-00326-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_11-cv-00326-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.