Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Achates Reference Publishing, Inc. v. Symantec Corporation et al, No. 2:11-cv-00294 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2013)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Motion to Dismiss Willfulness
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00294, Dkt. No. 340
Decided
February 26, 2013
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

ACHATES REFERENCE §

PUBLISHING, INC. §

§ Plaintiff, § §

Case No. 2:11-CV-294-JRG-RSP

v. § § SYMANTEC CORP, et al. § § Defendants. §

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Symantec Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted (Dkt. No. 187, filed July 4, 2012). The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on January 10, 2013 (Dkt. No. 303). Given that no timely objections have been filed, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, Symantec’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 187) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and Achates’ claim for willful infringement as to Symantec is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Achates Reference Publishing, Inc. v. Symantec Corporation et al, No. 2:11-cv-00294 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_11-cv-00294-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_11-cv-00294-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error