Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

GeoTag Inc v. The Western Union Company et al, No. 2:10-cv-00574 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 27, 2013)

Denied
General / Procedural
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00574, Dkt. No. 752
Decided
September 27, 2013
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER finding as moot 627 Motion for case management schedule and continuance
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

GEOTAG, INC. §

§ v. § Case No. 2:10-CV-574-MHS-RSP § WESTERN UNION COMPANY., ET AL. §

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Opposed Motion to Enter GeoTag’s Proposed Case Management Schedule, Postpone the Pretrial Conference and Trial Setting Date Four Months, and Create a Single Case Number for Consolidated Filings (Dkt. No. 627, filed November 6, 2012). Previously, the Court declined the invitation to consolidate cases. On May 15, 2013, the Court entered a First Amended Protective Order (Dkt. No. 717). On July 3, 2013, the Court noticed a hearing on claim construction. Accordingly, and in light of the Court’s new Docket Control Order, the Court finds that GeoTag’s Motion to Enter GeoTag’s Proposed Case Management Schedule and the parties’ Joint Motions for Entry of a Protective Order (Dkt. No. 627) should be and are hereby DENIED AS MOOT.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

GeoTag Inc v. The Western Union Company et al, No. 2:10-cv-00574 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 27, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_10-cv-00574-2
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_10-cv-00574-2

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case