Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

GeoTag Inc v. Starbucks Corp et al, No. 2:10-cv-00572 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 7, 2014)

Granted
Summary Judgment Non-Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00572, Dkt. No. 857
Decided
October 7, 2014
Judge
Michael H. Schneider, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 834 Report and Recommendations, 736 Sealed Motion filed by Domino's Pizza Inc
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

United States District Court

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

GEOTAG, INC., §

§ v. §

2:10-CV-572-MHS-RSP

§ STARBUCKS CORP., ET AL., §

§

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Domino’s Pizza, Inc.’s (“Domino’s”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-infringement Based on Lack of Dynamic Replication and Geographical Areas (Dkt. No. 736, filed May 16, 2014.) The Magistrate Judge filed a report recommending that the motion be granted. (Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 834, filed . August 5, 2014.)

After reviewing the objected to portions of the Report and Recommendation de novo, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation should be, and is hereby, ADOPTED. Accordingly, Domino’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-infringement Based on Lack of Dynamic Replication and Geographical Areas (Dkt. No. 736) is GRANTED.

It is SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 7th day of October, 2014.
Figure on page 1 of the opinion

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

GeoTag Inc v. Starbucks Corp et al, No. 2:10-cv-00572 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 7, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_10-cv-00572-3
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_10-cv-00572-3

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case