Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Bluestone Innovations Texas LLC vs Epistar Corp et al, No. 2:10-cv-00171 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2011)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00171, Dkt. No. 127
Decided
September 30, 2011
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - ORDERED that Defendants motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement (Dkt. No. 52) is DENIED
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

BLUESTONE INNOVATIONS TEXAS, §

L.L.C., § Plaintiff. §

§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10-cv-171-TJW-CE

§

v. § § FORMOSA EPITAXY INC., ET AL., §

Defendants. § ORDER

The above-titled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 121) has been presented for consideration. The report recommends that the court deny Defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The report further recommends that the court deny Defendants’ request for a more definite statement. Defendants did not file objections to the report.

The court is of the opinion that the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the court adopts the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, in its entirety, as the conclusions of this court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement (Dkt. No. 52) is DENIED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Bluestone Innovations Texas LLC vs Epistar Corp et al, No. 2:10-cv-00171 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2011).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_10-cv-00171-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_10-cv-00171-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case