Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

First american CoreLogic, Inc. v. Fiserv, Inc. et al, No. 2:10-cv-00132 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 23, 2012)

Denied
Summary Judgment § 101 Eligibility
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00132, Dkt. No. 426
Decided
September 23, 2012
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 259 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Limiting Damages For Failure to Mark Under 35 U.S.C. Section 287(a)
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

CORELOGIC INFORMATION §

SOLUTIONS, INC. §

§

Case No. 2:10-CV-132-RSP

v. § § FISERV, INC., et al. §

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment that the Patent-In-Suit is Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Dkt. No. 261, filed April 18, 2012). Defendants’ motion is DENIED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

First american CoreLogic, Inc. v. Fiserv, Inc. et al, No. 2:10-cv-00132 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 23, 2012).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_10-cv-00132-5
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_10-cv-00132-5

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case