Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Microunity Systems Engineering Inc v. acer Inc et al, No. 2:10-cv-00091 (E.D. Tex. July 16, 2013)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00091, Dkt. No. 757
Decided
July 16, 2013
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - All claims asserted by Micrunity Systems and Nokia Corp and Nokia Inc are hereby dismissed with prejudice
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

MICRUNITY SYSTEMS §

ENGINEERING, INC. §

§ Plaintiff, §

CASE NO. 2:10cv091

§

CONSOLIDATED

vs. §

PATENT CASE

§ ACER, INC., ET AL. §

§ Defendants. §

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF NOKIA CORP. AND NOKIA INC.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on June 26, 2013 (Dkt. No. 751) regarding MicroUnity’s Opposed Motion for Dismissal of Defendants Nokia Corp. and Nokia Inc. (Dkt. No. 729). As no objections have been filed, the Court adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that all claims for relief asserted by MicroUnity Systems Engineering, Inc. against Nokia Inc. and Nokia Corporation, and all claims for relief asserted against MicroUnity Systems Engineering, Inc. by Nokia Inc. and Nokia Corporation herein are DISMISSED WITH PREDJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses shall be borne by each party incurring the same.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 16th day of July, 2013.

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

LEONARD DAVIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Microunity Systems Engineering Inc v. acer Inc et al, No. 2:10-cv-00091 (E.D. Tex. July 16, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_10-cv-00091-3
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_10-cv-00091-3

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case