TECHNOLOGIES LLC § § vs. § CASE NO. 2:09-CV-354-TJW-CE § ANDERSON CUSTOM ELECTRONICS, §
INC., ET AL. §
ORDER
The above-titled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 132), which contains his recommendation that the court deny as moot the defendant Fraen SRL Holding Corporation’s motions to dismiss (Dkt. No. 53), has been presented for consideration. No objections were filed to the report and recommendation. The court is of the opinion that the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the court hereby adopts the report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the conclusions of this court. Accordingly, the defendant’s motions to dismiss are DENIED as moot.
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
Light Transformation Technologies LLC v. anderson Custom Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:09-cv-00354 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2010).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.