ORDER; adopting 150 Report and Recommendations,, denying 52 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America. Accordingly, the plaintiff shall file its amended complaint within ten days
PALTALK HOLDINGS, INC. § § vs. § CASE NO. 2:09-CV-274-DF-CE § SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT §
AMERICA INC., ET AL. §
ORDER
The above-titled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 150), which contains his recommendation that the court deny the defendants Sony Corporation’s and Sony Corporation of America’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 52), and instead treating it as a motion for a more definite statement, has been presented for consideration. No objections were filed to the report and recommendation. The court is of the opinion that the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the court adopts, in its entirety, the report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the conclusions of this court. Accordingly, the plaintiff shall file its amended complaint within ten days.
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
PalTalk Holdings, Inc. v. Sony Computer Entertainment america, Inc. et al, No. 2:09-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 1, 2010).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.